
The ruling (Department of Transportation v. Adams Outdoor Advertising of Charlotte) was dated September 29. It focused on the State’s 2011 taking of a legal nonconforming billboard.
In a long-running legal battle over compensation, an appeals court in North Carolina said the billboard was non-compensable personal property. But a majority of North Carolina’s Supreme Court concluded:

* The value added by Adams Outdoor’s billboard may be considered in determining the fair market value
* Rental income derived from leasing advertising space on the billboard may be considered in determining the fair market value
* Value added to the leasehold interest by the permits issued to Adams Outdoor may be considered in determining the fair market value
* The automatic ten-year extension of the lease may be considered in determining the fair market value, but options to renew the lease after the automatic ten-year extension may not be
* The bonus value method evidence offered by North Carolina’s DOT may not be considered in determining the fair market value of the leasehold interest
Click here for the 38-page decision.
[wpforms id=”9787″]
Paid Advertisement