• Clear Channel Outdoor Continues to Fight Baltimore Billboard Tax

    Clear Channel Outdoor continues to challenge Baltimore’s billboard tax as a violation of the First Amendment.

    In February, a Maryland Tax Court judge upheld Baltimore’s tax, rejecting Clear Channel’s constitutional claims.  On June 29, Clear Channel filed a 35-page brief supporting its appeal to a Maryland circuit court.

    “The Tax Court wrongly concluded that Clear Channel was ineligible for First Amendment protection because it was engaged in the business of publishing third-party speech in exchange for financial compensation,” said Clear Channel’s brief.  “That conclusion is irreconcilable with long-established First Amendment precedent.”

    Baltimore enacted a billboard tax on June 20, 2013, at the rate of $15 per square foot of digital billboards and $5 per square foot on other billboards.  Clear Channel pays the city approximately $1.5 million a year under the tax.

    The tax is constitutionally flawed, says Clear Channel, because it singles out a small group of speakers for a unique financial burden.

    The company is represented by Sidley Austin of Washington, DC, and Rosenberg Martin Greenberg of Baltimore.

    A similar tax has recently cropped up in Cincinnati, and the industry is evaluating its next steps.  Insider will write more about the Cincinnati tax later this week.


    Paid Advertisement

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *